Follow Us

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

About AIM

A full-service resource for Massachusetts employers - issues, HR services, training, insurance. Visit our home page.

 HealthCostBlogIcon

Posts by category

AIM Business Insider

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

CORI Reform Forces Many Employers to Change Job Applications

  
  
  

In the iconic 1960s folk song Alice’s Restaurant, folk singer Arlo Guthrie is about to be drafted when a military recruiter asks, “Have you ever been arrested?” The question provokes a detailed retelling of Guthrie’s arrest for littering one Thanksgiving in Stockbridge, Massachusetts.

CORI ReformCome November, most Massachusetts employers will no longer be able to ask prospective employees about their criminal histories – at least on job applications. The new Massachusetts criminal records reform law prohibits employers from asking questions on an “initial, written application form” about an applicant’s “criminal offender record information,” which includes criminal charges, arrests, and incarceration.

That means you have to replace your employment application if it contains any language related to criminal history, such as:

Have you ever been convicted of a felony?  If yes, give dates and details of conviction.

or:

Have you been convicted of a misdemeanor within the past five years other than a first conviction for any of the following misdemeanors:  drunkenness, simple assault, speeding, minor traffic violations, affray, or disturbance of the peace?

These questions have been legal and commonplace on Massachusetts employment applications for years, but the rules will change when the new law takes effect in November.

Governor Patrick signed the Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) reform on August 6.  The provision governing employment applications amends a portion of the Massachusetts Fair Employment Practices Law that allowed questions about felony convictions and about misdemeanor convictions not protected from disclosure.

The only exceptions to the initial job application requirements in the CORI reform law are for (1) positions for which a federal or state law, regulation, or accreditation disqualifies an applicant based on a conviction; or (2) employers who are subject to an obligation under a federal or state law or regulation not to employ persons who have been convicted. 

The CORI reform law creates many additional questions for employers regarding the hiring process.  At this time, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security is charged with creating rules and regulations on CORI reform, which will help to answer many outstanding questions.  Stay tuned for additional detailed information and guidance. 

Please call AIM’s HR Hotline at 800-470-6277 with questions about the new criminal records law. AIM also offers legally compliant job applications customized with your company logo. 

Comments

Rapists, Pedophiles, Murderers, really and we can't ask? I am not sure I am following the logic, but it is MA so maybe that should say it all. Dukas all over again. Let us protect the criminals not the victims or the "prospective" victims.  
 
Or did I miss something?
Posted @ Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:44 AM by Michelle Drolet
M. Drolet, is just showing the true nature of the need for reform. Most people I know affected by this issue, are people who have never been convicted of anything, however have seen problems (charges)with the law in their youth. Now they have moved on and find that many jobs will not even entertain their application. Also, I have found that many of the people who were charged to read these reports lacked the training to determine what the report says. This was well overdo!
Posted @ Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:08 AM by Sprinter
Sprinter. I hate when people use the extreme as an example. Your scenario helps a miniscule part of the problem. This is going to be a nightmare for employers, endanger the safety of employees and put non profits like ours that deal with children in a legal nightmare.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:19 AM by Bo Diddley
Recidivism is cited as the fear-based reason for the banishment of criminals--excluding them from employment, housing, polite society. Banishment from society causes recidivism. Stop banishing those who've done their time and you'll lower recidvism and show that rehabilitation is possible.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:24 PM by Manny Overwalls
This does not have to do with recidivism and not including people from employment, but it does have to do with full disclosure and being able to make informed decisions. I don't think that a juvenile record would stop someone from hiring a bright educated prospective employee. Question, do they have to disclose if they were a juvenile? I don't think so.  
 
Helping is one thing which I agree, but protection of my employees is very important to.  
 
Lets hire our troops coming back home, they need jobs too!
Posted @ Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:50 PM by M
WOW...hey, BONEHEADS...learn to READ...it says they must not ask during the "initial" application, but they can, as they do now, run criminal background/credit checks!!!...those criminal background checks are the ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY OOOOONLY way to ensure people like you Bo Diddley, do NOT get into legal issues with your non-profit by people LYING on applications when asked about their background!!!...if anything, it'll start the widespread practice of companies actually RUNNING background checks instead of expecting CRIMINALS to be HONEST with them about something they'll NEVER be found out about...SERIOUSLY!!!...ignorance truly IS bliss, isn't it?
Posted @ Wednesday, September 01, 2010 3:16 PM by Beantown Big Boy
All this does is allow people to be considered for positions based on their qualifications, experience and talents FIRST and allow THOSE things to be weighed against their criminal history secondarily...I'm certain there are some people who've been excluded from consideration for positions they were perfect for simply because of a "yes" answer on their initial application and that employers must actually look at them WHOLLY now...as I said before, what's MOST relevant and important to ME is that employers must now take an ACTIVE roll in "protecting their employees" in the form of criminal background checks as opposed to relying on the current and passive "honor system" to uncover the criminal records of potential employees who, I'm certain, would not hesistate to be LESS than honorable in circumventing a simple Q&A if it meant them getting a job...
Posted @ Wednesday, September 01, 2010 3:26 PM by Beantown Big Boy
I am of two minds on this issue. I want to be happy because people who made a mistake no longer have to worry about their Cori's (Cori's stay with you and can stop you from getting a job, apartment etc no matter how small the offense was) On the other hand violent offenders will have an easier time getting places that might risk our lives. 
 
I can't believe that this is the only solution. There needs to be a better policy put into action. One that doesn't hurt people who make a mistake and one that doesn't put innocent people in the path of a violent offender.
Posted @ Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:51 PM by Krysta
Like Beantown Big Boy said, the law says they can't ask ON AN APPLICATION. They can certainly ask and/or run a background check later.  
 
As for the violent offenders, I would rather see them putting cans on a shelf at a grocery store than wandering the streets bemoaning their inability to get a job.
Posted @ Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:31 PM by Heidi
I think that there should be a time limit on felonies. If they commited a felony when they were in their youth and now their 35 and educated themselves, had a responsible lifestyle, and have been free of felonies for 10 years then the CORI could be reflective of the past ten years.A forever tag is an awful thing regardless what it is.Just a thought....
Posted @ Friday, September 03, 2010 1:05 PM by orion
If people read the law instead of skimming through it, it specifically states that murders and sex offenders stay on the CORI permantely. I am for people getting a second chance. My take on the matter is let them get the job and work. If they re-offend then they will not be able to do it for another 10 yrs. Hopefully by then they would have grown up. If they have not truely rehabilitated, then they will re-offend and have to wait another ten yrs. Sucks for them but some people do deserve a second chance.
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 4:20 PM by greenmaxi0704
I am a pediatric nurse and have been for 17 years - I have two arrests for assault as a result of domestic violence one was dropped the other dismissed but have lost out on jobs because of the arrests and treated badly
Posted @ Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:21 PM by nurse
I am a job developer and work with ex-offenders. I believe that the new law will give people an oppertunity to explain themself during an interview and not be oustered before meeting with an interviewer
Posted @ Monday, March 07, 2011 11:24 AM by Christine Pineda
Comments have been closed for this article.