AIMBlog_Logo_Resized

DraftKings CEO Sees Bright Future

Posted by Christopher Geehern on Nov 17, 2017 11:33:48 AM

The worlds of sports, media and gaming are likely to coalesce during the next several years and the co-founder and chief executive of Boston-based DraftKings believes his company and its 8 million customers will be a major player in that new world.

Robins.jpgJason Robins, who built DraftKings into a $1.5 billion fantasy sports colossus in just five years, told 250 business executives at the AIM Executive Forum this morning that companies like his have raised interest in professional sports and given fans an entirely new experience of watching everything from NFL Football to major league soccer

“A lot of exciting things on the horizon,” he said during a 45-minute conversation with AIM President Richard Lord.

"What technology and mobile have done for gaming and media, it's incredible, and we've only sort of reached the tip of the iceberg. I think you're going to see a convergence of media and gaming.

"I also think this sort of media landscape where all the content is scattered around different places and you have to have a bunch of different services or you have to sort through 800 cable channels to find what you're looking for, it's not necessary anymore."

Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) allows fans to enter daily and weekly fantasy sports contests and win prizes based on individual players’ performances. Industry researchers estimate that players spent an estimated $3.26 billion on daily fantasy sports in 2016.

Robins said DraftKings surpassed more established competitors to became the pre-eminent DFS company “because we had a better mousetrap.” The keys to that mousetrap, he said, were products, technology and analytics that created a “game within a game” for sports fans.

What Robins and his partners did not anticipate in 2012 was the intense level of regulatory scrutiny that DraftKings and other DFS companies would engender both in Massachusetts and across the country.

DraftKings has supported consumer-protection regulations for the fantasy industry implemented by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey in 2016 covering issues such as excluding minors, ensuring “fair” gameplay, prohibiting contests on college sports, and spelling out standard marketing practices. Robins said those regulations, though not perfect, have become the basis for DFS legislation in more than a dozen other states.

The company is less enthusiastic about a commission report several months ago that recommended that the Massachusetts Legislature enact a law that would label DFS as gambling and give the Massachusetts Gaming Commission oversight over the industry.

“I will continue to work with them on the way they have gone about their analysis,” Robins said.

He believes the future is a bright one for DraftKings in large measure because of its customer demographics. DraftKings, he said, have the customers everyone wants – millennials in higher income brackets who do not hesitate to spend money on entertainment.

"What we've tried to do is position ourselves as a platform, partner with companies that own these types of rights, and say, look, we can help you in the world where you're trying to grow your subscriptions, your direct-to-consumer business," Robins said.

"We have the customers you want, we know exactly what they're interested in and we have the data to target them."

Topics: Technology, AIM Executive Forum

Reduced Employer Access to Criminal Records Harms Ex-Offenders

Posted by Brad MacDougall on Nov 13, 2017 8:00:00 AM

Update: The Massachusetts House of Representatives passed a comprehensive criminal justice reform bill last week that will narrow employer access to the criminal records of job applicants. AIM believes such restrictions will hurt the very ex-offenders they are designed to help. 

It also seeks to expunge some offenders’ criminal records. Both the House and Senate bills would allow convictions to be sealed after seven years for a felony and three years for a misdemeanor, down from 10 and five years today.

The House bill would also allow someone to seal a conviction for resisting arrest, which currently cannot be sealed.

The House bill expands the ability for someone who had a record sealed to be able to say he has no record in applications for housing or professional licenses.

The House and the Senate will next convene a committee of conference to negotiate the differences in the two pieces of legislation and then send it to Gov. Charlie Baker’s desk.

AIM told members of the state House of Representatives this morning that  the proposed narrowing of employer access to the criminal records of job applicants will reduce employment opportunities for former offenders.

ScalesofJusticeVerySmall.jpgAIM is concerned about language in a criminal justice reform to be debated today that would make access to information through the Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) more difficult by sealing records and limiting access.

AIM believes the changes would harm the very people those the measure is designed to help.  Without access, employers are left without relevant information about potential hiring decisions. Restricting an employer’s access to information has been shown to hinder job applicants and employer’s ability to maintain a safe workplace. 

The commonwealth’s largest employer association has provided feedback in a number of ways during the current legislative session. AIM sent letters to the Joint Committee on the Judiciary on April 28, 2017 and on July 17, 2017, and also hosted a briefing on this topic with the legislative sponsor and AIM members.

AIM appreciates that those and other conversations resulted in the inclusion of a negligent-hiring provision contained in SECTION 87 subsection 100S of the proposed reform bill.  AIM is also supportive of a provision that would enable the commonwealth to move towards fingerprinting and exchanging data with the National Criminal Information Center (NCIS) to ensure that records are accurate and connected to the correct person.

The Massachusetts Senate approved its own version of criminal justice reform on October 26.

AIM is concerned about the following provisions:

Sections 81-86 and 87: Sealing and Expungement of a Criminal Record: As proposed, the language would reduce the wait time to seal a misdemeanor conviction from five years to three years and a felony conviction from 10 years to seven years.  To address this AIM supports:

  • Amendment #50 to remove sealing and expungement provisions
  • Amendment #132 to allow employers that have employees with access to financial information, cash instruments and vulnerable populations to retain access to five years of misdemeanors and 10 years for felony convictions as currently provided under law
  • Amendment #134, to provide employers with six months to make changes to job applications, internal policies and to conduct training for hiring managers

Section 84 and 87 Job Applications: This language requires employers to amend job applications to acknowledge the candidate’s proposed rights under the expungement provision.  Employers would be required to add the language from section 84 and section 87, which contains similar language for job applications.  To address this AIM supports:

  • Amendment #130 and #131, to retain currently proposed language into one paragraph to address a candidate’s rights regarding sealing and expungement.
  • Amendment #120, to provide employers with six months to a year to fully implement changes in job applications, internal policy documents and to conduct training for hiring managers.

AIM supports amendment #50 to strike the language and amendment #118, which would provide for six months for employers to be in compliance and conduct training for hiring managers.

Sections 49-56, 62: Felony Thresholds: This language will make it challenging for employers to address growing concerns with larceny and ongoing threats related to personal information and credit card fraud.  AIM supports amendment #126, which would strike these provisions.

Takeaways:

 

 

Topics: Employment Law, CORI, Massachusetts House of Representatives

AIM to Senate - Control Health Costs, Reform MassHealth

Posted by Katie Holahan on Nov 8, 2017 11:50:22 AM

Editor's note - The following are excerpts of a letter that AIM sent to Senate President Stan Rosenberg and members of the Senate as they began debate on a health-care reform measure. The Senate passed its health reform bill last week.

Dear Mr. President and Members of the Senate:

After eleven years of universal health insurance, Massachusetts has made great strides to ensure our residents have access to some of the best health care in the nation and the world. Thus far, we have failed to make comparable progress in containing the cost of both health-care services and insurance for employers and their work forces.

MedicalRecordSmall.jpgMassachusetts residents are assured of access to high quality health care, without the assurance that they can afford it. Our complex, confusing health-care system leaves both consumers and employers at a disadvantage when it should empower them to advocate for their long-term health and productivity.

According to the most recent data available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMMS), Massachusetts was the second highest-spending state for health care in 2014 shelling out 30 percent more than the national average. Personal health-care spending in Massachusetts, per capita, has increased more than 12 percent in five years – from $9,417 in 2009 to $10,559 in 2014.

Cost growth like this is unsustainable and has increased unabated in the face of attempts by both employers and the commonwealth to contain it.

Employers, especially smaller employers, have almost nothing to show in the way of cost savings and efficiencies five years after Massachusetts’ major push toward health-care cost containment. These cost increases are occurring in an industry in which experts agree that at least one-third of all care is unnecessary – delivered in the wrong setting; marked by a lack of coordination; provided with an inadequate emphasis on prevention; harmed by medical errors; burdened with rules and fraud; or just plain excessive.

We are pleased by the Senate’s focus on difficult and expensive issues like Massachusetts’ high re-admission rates, to encourage more efficient care focus on keeping consumers healthy and out of care settings. We also support the Senate’s efforts to include provider costs in the commonwealth’s efforts to track and contain year-over-year spending increases.

We would like to express our support for Amendment #38, filed by Senator Donaghue, and Amendment #67, filed by Senator deMacedo, both of which return assessments on carriers and providers to rate payers in the form of premium reductions. The most meaningful immediate health-care reform for employers and workers is a reduction in their monthly premiums.

With that in mind, we would urge careful consideration of any new policies, with particular focus on potential financial implications. A number of amendments have been filed that expand the mandated benefits required for coverage in Massachusetts. Although many health-care services are worthy, before acting to expand benefits we must understand the complete financial effects of any such changes, particularly since the Affordable Care Act requires that states pay for any mandated benefits enacted after December 31, 2011 in excess of the federally required essential health benefits.1

AIM would oppose the implementation of any new mandated benefits, without the completion of a fiscal analysis by the Center for Health Information and Analysis. The following amendments contain some form of expanded mandated benefit:

LettertoSenate.jpg

We should, instead be further supporting innovative products and practices that lower costs and encourage healthy habits and practices. We would like to express our support for Amendments #51 and 101, filed by Senators Moore and Timilty, respectively, to reinstate the Wellness Tax Credit for small employers.

AIM also supports Senator Moore’s Amendment #45, which would remove confusion about the definition of telemedicine and would allow licensed providers to prescribe certain medicines. We are supportive of facilitating market-based solutions that could help employers innovate and bring down costs.

However, in a state facing an alarming deficit in its Medicaid program, employers are now shouldering the escalating costs of the public healthcare system. For the next two years, employers statewide will provide at least $200M annually in funding for MassHealth. This is in addition to the cost and administrative burden of providing commercial health insurance to their workers.

Most importantly, employers are tasked with closing a funding deficit absent any of the long-term structural reforms needed to solve the underlying financial problems with the program. Over the past eleven years, employers have implemented wellness programs, purchased innovative insurance products, embarked on employee educational programs – all with the goal of providing higher quality insurance that keeps their employees healthier and costs lower.

The same cannot be said of the public health insurance program. We oppose any amendments that expand the current MassHealth program, including Amendments #2, 93, and 153. Regardless of enrollment rates, action must be taken to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of this currently unsustainable program. The result will not be simply cost reductions, but higher quality of care for enrollees in the long term.

Thus, we express our support for Amendments #74 and #122, filed by Senator Tarr, which not only eliminate the buy-in option for MassHealth, but also provide a framework for efficiently determining eligibility so those who truly need it can access much-needed health-care services.

We would like to voice our strong support of Amendment #57, filed by Senator deMacedo, which would eliminate the so-called Name and Shame list.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) reversed existing Massachusetts law and now allows income-eligible employees to decline employer coverage and seek insurance through MassHealth. That change created a migration of newly eligible individuals to MassHealth, substantially increasing the Commonwealth’s financial burden. The ACA made public health insurance an economically rational choice for eligible residents in a state known for its expensive health-care system, and employers should not be publicly shamed for a choice they cannot control.

As MassHealth enrollment grows, the commonwealth experiences the reality that employers have faced for years: the high cost of health-care coverage in this state threatens the underpinnings of our economy. Policymakers who have concentrated almost exclusively on access and coverage now face a renewed imperative to lower the cost of health insurance for everyone in Massachusetts.

We are active participants in providing health insurance to the majority of residents in the commonwealth, a role that we have played for the past 10 years and more. It is an integral part of the Massachusetts economy and we look forward to working with you to bring the same level of innovation and sustainability to health care coverage, traits which Massachusetts is known for worldwide.

Topics: Health Care Costs, Health Insurance

Business Confidence Hits Another High for 2017

Posted by Christopher Geehern on Nov 7, 2017 8:27:44 AM

Employer confidence in Massachusetts hit another high for 2017 during October as economic growth accelerated and companies remained optimistic about the national outlook.

BCI.October.2017.jpgThe Associated Industries of Massachusetts Business Confidence Index (BCI) edged up 0.3 points to 62.7, leaving it 6.5 points better than in October 2016. The uptick was driven by a brightening view of employment growth and firming confidence among manufacturers.

The reading came as MassBenchmarks reported that the Massachusetts economy grew at 5.9 percent during the third quarter, almost double the rate of the national economy. Payroll employment grew at a 2.1 percent annual rate in Massachusetts in the third quarter as compared to 1.2 percent nationally.

“The acceleration of the Massachusetts economy in the third quarter provided additional fuel to an already solid sense of confidence among employers as we head for 2018,” said Raymond G. Torto, Chair of AIM's Board of Economic Advisors (BEA) and Lecturer, Harvard Graduate School of Design.

“At the same time, optimism about the national economy suggests that employers believe growth rates throughout the US will increase even more if Congress follows through on its proposal to lower the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent.”

The AIM Index, based on a survey of Massachusetts employers, has appeared monthly since July 1991. It is calculated on a 100-point scale, with 50 as neutral; a reading above 50 is positive, while below 50 is negative. The Index reached its historic high of 68.5 on two occasions in 1997-98, and its all-time low of 33.3 in February 2009.

The Index has remained above 50 since October 2013.

Constituent Indicators

The constituent indicators that make up the overall Business Confidence Index pointed mostly higher during October.

The Massachusetts Index, assessing business conditions within the commonwealth, slipped 0.3 points to 65.1, still 4.1 points more than a year earlier. October marked the 91st consecutive month in which employers have been more optimistic about the Massachusetts economy than the national economy.

The U.S. Index of national business conditions rose 2.7 points to 62.5, continuing a 13.3-point surge for the 12-month period. 

The Current Index, which assesses overall business conditions at the time of the survey, increased 0.7 points to 63.6 while the Future Index, measuring expectations for six months out, remained even at 61.9 points. The Current Index has risen 7.6 points and the Future Index 5.6 points during the past year.

Operational Views

The Company Index, reflecting overall business conditions, lost 0.3 points to 62.0. There was better news in the Employment Index, a key predictor of economic health, which rose 2.0 points to 57.8.

“The Massachusetts economy continues to grow at a robust pace and to add jobs in a broad array of sectors despite tightening regional labor markets. With the statewide unemployment rate now below four percent, it is not clear the commonwealth’s economic expansion is sustainable at its current pace,” noted Professor Michael D. Goodman, Executive Director of the Public Policy Center (PPC) at UMass Dartmouth and a BEA member.
Massachusetts Concerns

AIM President and CEO Richard C. Lord, a BEA member, said employer optimism continues to be tempered by the prospect of three potentially destructive ballot questions appearing on the 2018 state election ballot.

“Massachusetts employers face an unprecedented public-policy crisis as activists seek to place three questions on the 2018 Massachusetts election ballot that would together impede economic growth for a generation: a surtax on incomes of more than $1 million, an expansive and bureaucratic paid family leave program and an increase in the minimum wage,” Lord said.

“Having just honored 16 Massachusetts employers for creating jobs and economic opportunity for the people of Massachusetts, AIM remains concerned about ballot questions that are clearly intended to be punitive toward employers.”

Topics: AIM Business Confidence Index, Massachusetts economy, Massachusetts employers

State Issues Regulations on Employer Health Assessment

Posted by Katie Holahan on Nov 6, 2017 4:08:53 PM

The Baker Administration today released draft regulations for the new employer health assessment designed to close a budget shortfall in the state's MassHealth program.

Read the Draft Regulations

The regulations, published by the Massachusetts Department of Unemployment Assistance (DUA), explain details of how the new Employer Medical Assistance Contribution (EMAC) supplement will be administered. The EMAC supplement is a new wage tax, levied on employers who have certain workers enrolled in either the MassHealth program or subsidized Health Connector coverage. 

  1. Employers with six or more employees will access their estimated liability for the EMAC supplement quarterly, via their DUA online account when they provide their quarterly wage filing;
  2. Detailed information will be provided as to the number of their employees on MassHealth or subsidized Connector coverage;
  3. Employers have 10 days from receipt of this information to appeal their determination of liability to the DUA.

The draft regulationsare available for public review and response. The Department will hold five listening sessions, across the state, to allow employers and interested parties to provide in-person feedback:

  • Boston | November 13 | 1-3 pm | Hurley Building
  • Springfield | November 14 | 10 am - nooon | Department of Industrial Accidents office
  • Worcester | November 15 | 2-4 pm | Department of Industrial Accidents office
  • Lawrence | November 16 | 10 am - noon | Department of Transitional Assistance.

A fifth session will be scheduled on Cape Cod.

Questions and suggestions may also be shared with the Department electronically.

 

Topics: Controlling Health Care Costs, Employer Health Assessment

Video Blog | Startup Provides Internet Access in the Developing World

Posted by Kristen Rupert on Nov 2, 2017 1:37:13 PM

Editor's Note - How do you provide Internet access to people in developing countries where there is no power to charge phones or access the Web? WrightGrid, a startup based in Somerville’s Greentown Labs, has come up with the answer. WrightGrid has developed a solar-powered cell phone charger and wi-fi station designed to provide information access to people in countries such as Ghana and the Democratic Republic of Congo. WrightGrid this week accepted the 2017 AIM Global Innovation Award.

 

Topics: Technology, AIM International Business Council, International b

AIM, Citing Safety Concerns, Opposes Criminal Justice Bill

Posted by Brad MacDougall on Oct 25, 2017 10:00:00 AM

Associated Industries of Massachusetts (AIM) this morning announced its opposition to the state Senate’s criminal justice reform bill because the measure would unduly restrict the ability of employers to ensure the safety of employees, customers and others in the workplace.

ScalesofJusticeVerySmall.jpgThe proposed legislation will, in fact, harm the very people the proponents of the bill seek to help. AIM-member employers met with the legislative sponsor of the bill in July and made clear that candidates for jobs are less successful in achieving gainful employment when employers have less information.

“An employer is more likely to hire an ex-offender when that employer has the information available to make a balanced decision,” said John Regan, Executive Vice President of Government Affairs at AIM.

AIM has a long history of involvement with efforts to balance the need for employers to conduct responsible criminal background checks with the ability of offenders to find employment.

The association helped to forge the 2009 Criminal Offender Records Information (CORI) legislative compromise and worked on the recent regulatory changes to CORI. The business community made significant concessions in the 2009 bill, but the current legislation goes far beyond what employers agreed to in 2009.

Employers believe that criminal background checks are necessary to ensure that the company or institution is complying with state and federal regulations, in addition to international standards. These standards apply for a variety of businesses including hospitals and financial institutions.

Employers also believe that inability to access criminal histories makes companies vulnerable to claims for everything from negligent hiring and failure to meet regulatory obligations to failure to protect client data and failure to protect visitors from harm.

“Employers face significant risk and legal liability for hiring and retaining employees who pose a risk. As written, the legislation does not acknowledge that employers would still be responsible for negligent hiring and negligent retention without a waiver of liability,” Regan said.

The Senate is expected to debate S.2185 and several amendments tomorrow.

Takeaways:

 

Topics: Massachusetts senate, Employment Law, CORI

Health Reform Must Address Employer Costs

Posted by Katie Holahan on Oct 24, 2017 11:33:45 AM

Associated Industries of Massachusetts (AIM) is pleased that the state Senate on Monday conducted a hearing on a proposal to address the challenging issue of healthcare affordability. The primary question for AIM in evaluating any such proposed legislation is whether it eases the burden of employers struggling to provide good health insurance to workers.

health_care.jpgIn 2006, employers joined with doctors, hospitals, patient advocates, and lawmakers to forge a health-reform law that required everyone to share the responsibility for improving access to health care. Eleven years later, Massachusetts residents enjoy the highest levels of health-insurance coverage in the nation.

Yet we have failed to make progress to contain the unsustainable increases in health-care costs.

According to the most recent data available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMMS), Massachusetts was the second highest-spending state for health care in 2014, shelling out 30 percent more than the national average.

Personal health-care spending in Massachusetts, per capita, has increased more than 12 percent in five years – from $9,417 in 2009 to $10,559 in 2014. Cost growth like this is unsustainable and has increased unabated in the face of attempts by both employers and the commonwealth to contain it.

Businesses, in fact, have almost nothing to show in the way of cost savings and efficiencies five years after Massachusetts made a major push toward health-care cost containment in 2012. The commonwealth has exceeded the 3.6 percent spending growth benchmark established as part of the health-cost control law of 2012 in two of the past four measurement periods.

Total Health Care Expenditures (THCE) grew by 4.2 percent from 2013 to 2014, and by 4.1 percent from 2014 to 2015. These cost increases are occurring in an industry in which experts agree that at least one-third of all care is unnecessary – delivered in the wrong setting; marked by a lack of coordination; provided with an inadequate emphasis on prevention; harmed by medical errors; burdened with rules and fraud; or just plain excessive.

Massachusetts employers have strong ideas about some of the policies included in the draft Senate health-reform legislation:

MassHealth Reforms

In a state facing an alarming deficit in its Medicaid program, employers are currently shouldering the escalating costs of the public health-care system. For the next two years, employers statewide will provide at least $200 million annually in funding for MassHealth in addition to the cost of providing commercial health insurance to their workers.

More importantly, employers are being asked to close a funding deficit absent any of the long-term structural reforms needed to solve the underlying financial problems with the program. Action must be taken to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of this currently unsustainable program.

Optional expanded Medicaid plan

AIM must raise grave concerns with the notion of expanding the MassHealth program through an optional Medicaid plan (SECTION 123) without first addressing existing policies that encourage and sustain needlessly expensive health-care habits.

Employers have long sought to contain costs in commercial health insurance by encouraging cost-effective habits like relying on primary care physicians for non-emergency care. The same cannot be said for the MassHealth program. The inappropriate use of emergency rooms is an example of one major cost driver identified by the Health Policy Commission. To contain costs and facilitate coverage, we must address our greatest cost-drivers in health-care utilization across the entire spectrum of both commercial and public health insurance before we implement any sort of further programmatic expansion.

“Name and Shame” List

AIM also opposes the so-called “Name and Shame” list (SECTION 38), highlighting employers with workers in the MassHealth program. The 2006 health-reform law made employees who were offered employer-sponsored health insurance ineligible for MassHealth. The intent was to balance the requirement that employers do their “fair share” with concerns about the financial burden on the MassHealth system.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) reversed that policy and allowed income-eligible employees to decline employer coverage and seek insurance through MassHealth. The change created a migration of newly-eligible individuals from their employer-sponsored insurance to MassHealth, substantially increasing the commonwealth’s financial burden. The ACA made public health insurance an economically rational choice for eligible residents in a state known for its expensive health-care system.

Provider Price Variation

Provider price variation includes both reasonable and unreasonable variation in the pricing of health care services. Reasonable variation in pricing should be supported and limited by a transparent marketplace in which consumers have access to clear cost and quality metrics. By mandating a minimum increase in provider prices (SECTION 111) without alleviating existing high-cost drivers, we facilitate the continued increase in price variation without seeking to understand and differentiate among the cost-drivers that result in both reasonable and unreasonable price variation.

Innovative Insurance Products

While we support market-based solutions through innovative insurance products like limited and tiered-network products, we are concerned that the differential limitations alone will be insufficient to leverage this new approach. Without a requirement that all providers participate in the contracting for such products, insurers will not always have the negotiating power to construct products in all regions of the commonwealth.

Scope-of-Practice Expansions

AIM supports the various scope-of-practice expansions included in the draft legislation. Expanding access to vital care from qualified providers for all residents of the commonwealth is a common-sense reform that helps to move us closer to a healthcare system that is efficient and effective.

Telemedicine

AIM supports the inclusion of telemedicine services (SECTION 94) to facilitate innovative, cost-effective health-care services for consumers across the commonwealth. Telemedicine services could provide additional care options for consumers with limited access, preserve productivity, and reduce time lost traveling great distances to providers. A vital component of this policy is requirement that payment for telemedicine services cannot exceed the costs related to an in-person visit. We must prioritize innovative policies that both increase access and decrease costs for residents statewide. Telemedicine should and could do exactly that.

AIM-member employers are active participants in providing health insurance to the majority of residents in the commonwealth. Moderating the cost of that insurance and putting health care on a financially sustainable business is critical to the future of the Massachusetts economy.

Please contact me at [email protected] if you would like to be updated on the progress of health reform in Massachusetts.

Topics: Massachusetts senate, Controlling Health Care Costs, Health Insurance

Employers Renew Commitment to Pay Equity

Posted by Joanne Hilferty on Oct 20, 2017 8:30:00 AM

Editor's Note - Joanne Hilferty is President and Chief Executive Officer of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries in Boston and a member of the AIM Board of Directors.

Massachusetts employers say they are committed to accelerating the modest progress they have made to close the gender pay gap.

Fourpeople.jpgScores of business leaders shared challenges and success stories recently at the third annual Boston Women’s Workforce Council (BWWC) Best Practices Conference at the Colonnade Hotel in Boston. Associated Industries of Massachusetts is a signatory to the Boston 100 Percent Talent Compact developed by the Council, Boston University and the City of Boston to ensure that men and women enjoy equal compensation opportunities in the work force.

Several prominent members of AIM have also signed the document, including Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Boston Children’s Hospital, Eastern Bank, Eversource, Harvard Pilgrim, MassMutual, MORE Advertising, National Grid, Putnam Investments, Staples and State Street Corporation. I am proud to say that the organization I lead, Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries, is also a signatory.

Companies that sign the compact commit to reviewing their compensation practices to ensure fairness. These companies provide compensation data anonymously to researchers at Boston University who use it to develop a broad assessment of wage equality in Massachusetts. 

“AIM signed the Compact because Massachusetts employers operate in a competitive, talent-driven economy in which companies that reward skilled workers equally will come out on top,” said Rick Lord, President and Chief Executive Officer of AIM.

“Wage equity will ultimately be driven by the marketplace, which is desperately short of the employees needed to drive economic growth in the next decade.”

The 2017 Best Practices Conference drew more than 220 participants.

Business leaders noted that companies looking at signing the compact have expressed concern about the need to guarantee the confidentiality of any compensation data they provide to the project. Council executives say they can guarantee confidentiality but need to better communicate that point to employers.

The conference also provided an opportunity for the BWWC’s Co-Chairs, Cathy Minehan and Evelyn Murphy, to share the highlights from the 2017 data analysis, the full results of which will be published in the organization’s 2017 report, out later this year.  The key takeaway was that there has been some progress – albeit limited – in addressing the wage gap.

Governor Charlie Baker last year signed a compromise pay-equity law that is intended to promote salary transparency while recognizing legitimate market forces such as performance and the competitive landscape for certain skills that cause pay differences among employees.  AIM supported the compromise.

Topics: Employment Law, Massachusetts employers, wage equity

Four Companies Earn Global Trade Awards

Posted by Kristen Rupert on Oct 16, 2017 8:30:00 AM

Associated Industries of Massachusetts today announced that its 22nd annual AIM Global Trade Awards will go to a developer of productivity software, a maker of abrasives that generates half of its revenue overseas, a UK-based technology consulting company and a startup bringing Internet connectivity to the developing world.

international.flagssmall.jpgThe awards recognize Massachusetts companies and public agencies of all sizes that have demonstrated excellence in international trade. The 2017 honorees, with locations across the region, represent a wide range of Massachusetts industries and include Aspen Technology, Darmann Abrasive Products, Cambridge Consultants and WrightGrid.

The four winners will be honored during the AIM Global Trade Symposium & Awards Breakfast on November 1 from 8-11am at Babson College’s Knight Auditorium in Wellesley.  In addition to a panel with executives from New Balance, Greentown Labs, the Canada Consulate, Northeastern University and Kinefac, the event will feature keynote speaker Nariman Behravesh, Chief Economist at Massachusetts-based IHS Markit who is ranked as Top Forecaster by Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal.

The Symposium & Awards program is sponsored by MassPort, Massachusetts Manufacturing Extension Partnership, Wolf & Co. and The Provident Bank.

“From innovation in product development to technologies that enhance traditional manufacturing, international trade plays a pivotal role in the health of the Massachusetts economy,” said Richard Lord, President and CEO of AIM. “We are delighted to honor the achievements of these local winners, who exhibit best practices in conducting and advancing global business. Massachusetts continues to be a world leader in exporting technology, products and ideas that make a difference.”

This year AIM launched the Global Innovation Award, presented to WrightGrid.  This award recognizes early stage companies making valuable contributions to international trade and focusing on the global market as the business evolves. 

President’s Award:  Aspen Technology
Bedford 

Aspen Technology, founded in 1981 as a result of an MIT research project, creates software that optimizes manufacturing in multiple industries including oil and gas, chemicals, engineering and construction, transportation, pharmaceuticals and more.

More than 2,100 companies across the globe use AspenTech software to increase throughput, reduce unplanned downtime, improve margins, reduce costs, achieve operational excellence and become more energy efficient.  More than 35 years after its founding, AspenTech’s US headquarters in Massachusetts is home to more than 500 employees who continue to push the boundaries of innovation.

 A publicly-owned company with over half of its sales coming from international business, AspenTech has more than 30 offices around the world.  

www.aspentech.com

Ambassador’s Award:  Darmann Abrasive Products
Clinton 

Darmann Abrasive Products, headquartered in Massachusetts, produces specialized abrasive products for customers that need to generate very fine finishes on their materials.  Its fine grit abrasive stones and wheels serve precision manufacturing industries ranging from automotive parts to medical supply.

Darmann’s offices in Poland, Brazil, Mexico and China, staffed by locals, enable it to offer high-level global customer service.  An employee-owned business, Darmann has adapted products for new foreign markets.  The company invested in its manufacturing plant to add capacity to meet global demand.  Exports represent more than 50 percent of the company’s annual sales. 

www.darmann.com

Diplomat’s AwardCambridge Consultants
Boston 

Cambridge Consultants uses innovation and new technologies to help clients worldwide develop first-to-market products or improve existing products.

Working from a laboratory setting, the company’s engineers, scientists, mathematicians and designers can take a product from concept to manufacturing.  The Boston office features a 'virtual operating room' where surgeons undertake mock surgery to show how existing tools are inefficient and in need of innovation.

The company serves a diverse range of industries including medical device, industrial and consumer products, digital health and wireless.  Cambridge Consultants is headquartered in the U.K. and has 80 employees in Boston, with plans to add 60 new jobs in Massachusetts by 2018. 

www.cambridgeconsultants.com

Global Innovation Award:  WrightGrid,
Somerville 

WrightGrid, a startup based in Somerville's clean-tech incubator Greentown Labs, is focused on bringing internet connectivity to the developing world.  Its seven-foot-tall, solar-powered WiFi and phone-charging machines are made for people with mobile phones but no reliable electricity or Internet connection. The company’s technology is specifically designed for the Africa market and its products are being deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Ghana.  WrightGrid's stations are entirely manufactured in Massachusetts. Metal Crafters in Methuen develops the frame of the units and Circuit Hub in Deerfield creates the circuit board and electronics.

www.wrightgrid.com

The AIM International Business Council helps Massachusetts employers engage in international trade and expand their global business activities. Through seminars, referrals, and e-newsletters, the AIM International Business Council provides companies with the resources they need.  For more, visit www.aimnet.org/international.

 

Topics: Global Trade Awards, International Trade, AIM International Business Council

Subscribe to our blog

Posts by popularity

Browse by Tag