AIMBlog_Logo_Resized

Employers Applaud New Standards for Teacher Evaluation

Posted by Andre Mayer on Jun 28, 2011 12:33:00 PM

The Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education today adopted new statewide teacher-evaluation regulations that place significant emphasis on student outcomes.

Teacher EvaluationsThe system, put forward by Commissioner Mitchell D. Chester, requires at least two measures of student learning when evaluating teachers:

  • One must be student gains on the statewide MCAS exams;
  • Others could include samples of student work, other commercially available assessments, or tests designed by individual districts or academic departments.

AIM endorsed the evaluation proposal earlier this month, urging Board of Education Chair Maura O. Banta to “support, or go beyond, Commissioner Chester’s proposal for the weighting of student achievement in such assessments.”  The employer community believes that reliable teacher evaluation is a key element of maintaining an education system capable of supporting the growth of the innovation-based Massachusetts economy.

Testifying on behalf of the employer community prior to the vote, Henry C. Dinger, chairman of the Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education (MBAE), told the board that “one of the greatest challenges we face in providing the kind of education that we want and need to provide to every child in the commonwealth is to make sure that there is a highly effective teacher in every classroom and that competent administrators lead every school.” Dinger urged adoption of the regulations as “a big first step toward this end by including student achievement as a significant factor in evaluating teachers and administrators for the first time."

AIM President Richard C. Lord commended the Board action. “While we might have preferred an even more aggressive approach, the Commissioner’s proposal goes beyond the rather weak recommendations of the task force report released in March, and represents significant improvement over the current situation of uneven and often lax standards – or no evaluation at all,” he said. Massachusetts employers, he added, “who maintain some of the most sophisticated continuous-improvement and employee-evaluation systems in the world, have already begun to share their expertise with educators, and will continue to do so as appropriate.”

Topics: Educator Evaluation, Associated Industries of Massachusetts, Education

Education Commissioner Proposes Stronger Educator Evaluation

Posted by Brian Gilmore on Apr 21, 2011 10:12:00 AM

education reform, AIM, teacher evaluationNoting that “no other school-based factor has as great an influence on student achievement as an effective teacher” but that “across the Commonwealth today, the state of evaluation systems in public schools is inconsistent and underdeveloped,” Dr. Mitchell D. Chester, the state’s Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, last week proposed new educator evaluation regulations that place significant emphasis on student outcomes. The Commissioner’s proposal, which is subject to approval by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, goes beyond the recommendations put forward by the Statewide Task Force on the Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators in its rather disappointing report last month.

The Commissioner’s approach focuses on five areas:

  • Reward Excellence:  require that districts celebrate excellence in teaching and administration;
  • Promote Growth and Developmentprovide educators with feedback and opportunities for development that support continuous growth and improvement;
  • Set a High Bar for Tenure:  entrants to the teaching force must demonstrate proficient performance within three years to earn Professional Teacher Status;
  • Shorten Timelines for Improvement:  Professional Teacher Status teachers who are not proficient have one year to demonstrate the ability to improve; and
  • Place Student Learning at the Center:  student learning is central to the evaluation and development of the Commonwealth’s administrators and teachers.

While we might have liked to see an even more aggressive proposal, we are aware that the evaluative processes and instruments that will be required are not fully in place – nor is the established trust essential to successful implementation of a plan that after all depends upon the participation of the educators themselves. Indeed, the Commissioner’s three-year implementation timetable is ambitious in light of the limited current capacity of school districts in the field of evaluation. His plan to “take advantage of the expertise of our best teachers through new teacher-led roles” in the process will be a key to success.

We are very pleased that Dr. Chester is explicit that his proposal is a first step. When “the new evaluation system called for in these regulations is fully implemented in districts across the Commonwealth and confidence in its fairness and transparency is warranted,” he notes, then we can move on to considering its use transfer, assignment, and lay-off decisions, and in group and individual compensation decisions based on performance.

The Commissioner’s proposal will be presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education on April 27. It is expected that a period of public comment will run through June 10, with final action by the Board due June 28.

Topics: Education Reform, Educator Evaluation, Teacher evaluation, Education, Massachusetts

Subscribe to our blog

Posts by popularity

Browse by Tag